Thursday, May 3, 2018

BYOD: Brief case study of the San Diego County Library policy



Hot topics this decade include breaking the internet, viral videos, and BYOD (bring your own device). The BYOD trend began when senior executives became “app-happy” with the rise of smartphones and tablets, Acohido says in his 2013 article about security, and continues as concerns are addressed using MDM (mobile device management).  Executives argued that to increase productivity, they needed more access to work items during non-work hours. (Let’s be frank though, executives don’t have many non-work hours, do they? I think the lines are kind of blurred for them.) IT departments argued that using a personal device for work couldn’t compromise company interests, and so they had to figure how to make the guys who sign their paychecks happy while fulfilling their obligations. San Diego County Library has built and developed their policies into a solution which gives employees flexibility while maintaining security.  

The county has a BYOD policy in place for employees, but it varies based on the type of employee. For example, library techs have use of an exclusive employee network which they can connect to from their smartphones and tables. They have apps for email, and are allowed off-network access via their login to their company email. This security layer of a private network is one example of a solution to the concerns personal devices present. Also, using logins for off-network access from a personal device has been a standard procedure for many years before handhelds. 

However, when an employee gets to upper management, the policy changes slightly. They are allowed access to download more apps than techs, based on their job duties and responsibilities. In this way of restricting mobile downloads based on the employee’s status, the library is able to give access to just those employees who need it and maintain security. 

At the highest levels of management, the policy restricts access to certain systems from personal devices, and only county-issued devices are allowable for access to certain mobile apps. This compromise allows upper management the flexibility of mobile computing but maintains sensitive data in a secure container. For example, the payroll app for timecard approvals can be done on a mobile device, but it must be a county-issues mobile device. 

According to Storey’s doctoral dissertation, “Organizations that support CIT [consumer information technology] in the workplace should have a bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policy designed to (a) safeguard the employee’s mobile device, (b) safeguard the organization’s network and data assets, and (c) stipulate a code of conduct for the employee to follow as a condition to use their own device at work.” The San Diego County Library has done an excellent job on all three points. 

 

The San Diego County Library is not affiliated with this blog and has neither endorsed nor denied its contents.


References

Acohido, B. (2013, January 8). Using personal devices at work gets more secure. USA Today, p. 01B. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com.ezproxy.palomar.edu/apps/doc/A314276156/OVIC?u=cclc_palomar&sid=OVIC&xid=0376f957

Meyer, E. (2018). Interview with Vanessa Perez, Assistant Branch Manager, SDCL. [Oral interview].

Storey, G. S. (2017). An empirical analysis of bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policy adoption in organizations (Order No. 10265019). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved from https://login.ezproxy.palomar.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.palomar.edu/docview/1886088909?accountid=35685


 



No comments: